"Globalization and the development of contemporary Chinese culture," Academic Forum held in Beijing

Recently, the Beijing Municipal Federation of Social Sciences and the Capital Normal University jointly organized the "Globalization and the development of contemporary Chinese culture," Academic Forum held in Beijing. From the Central Compilation and Translation Bureau, Peking University, Tsinghua University, Capital Normal University, Beijing Federation of Social Sciences and other units of the experts and scholars attended the forum on the clash of civilizations brought by globalization and integration, international economic and political changes in the pattern of the world the impact of cultural patterns, globalization of Chinese culture
Of the development issues discussed.

Capital Normal University, Professor Yang Shengping discusses the context of globalization several levels of cultural issues, cultural issues in the context of globalization that is a first as an economic, political and cultural concept of a unified system, the current globalization is not only economic and technological issues , but also in the global capitalist system expansion, and globalization should be a real hope for the establishment of the socialist system in the world. Which socialist countries like China should, in the cultural building clever use of current international situation, problems and contradictions, adjust strategies, Lianhe many developing countries will lead the multi-polar world, the road of peaceful development, win more for their own the development of more time and space. Should also take into account the characteristics of national culture and its role. National culture has a deep social basis of the value of a strong core stability and independence, in the face of a complex international environment, national culture should lay this card, to make use of different national cultures deal with the nation-state relations, and enhance country's international influence and national cohesion, oppose all forms of cultural hegemony and the narrow-minded nationalism.

Professor of Peking University by Feng Yi, in the face of globalization, culture is the most fundamental and most profound problem is to establish cultural self and cultural self in addition to safeguarding and realizing the function of their own interests, there is a global showcase and realize their cultural value and intrinsic value, to establish their role and status of the image. Culture is not just a spiritual self and the spirit of the concept of products, but also as a person accumulated code of conduct, behavior and way of life. Highlight self-awareness, not exclusive global awareness, cultural awareness between self and world are mutually generated, mutually reinforcing relationship, to distinguish between the post-colonial boundaries and cultural isolationism. He believes that the establishment of cultural self-correct the problem, we should deal with cultural integration and exchange, culture and innovation and debugging as well as cultural production and consumption, and several other important issues.

Central Compilation and Translation Bureau Yang Jinhai researchers on the current Chinese Cultural Renaissance and the Renaissance compared pointed out that today we call the cultural renaissance in the context of globalization to promote the revival of Chinese culture, and the Western world at the time the development of the Renaissance is also Comparing the case of partial implementation of part of the world cultural renaissance. Chinese Cultural Renaissance of the most important issue is the cultural revival of the whole nation should be a conscious, cultural renaissance for the modernization, can not simply apply the Western culture, to create a new discourse, including, the new strategic concept, the new production methods, management methods such as culture. He believes that to meet the globalization needs to implement changes in the two ways of thinking: one way of thinking from the turn of revolutionary struggle and construction of the way of thinking, the second is from a closed culture of thinking to an open culture of thinking.